FROM COUNTERCULTURE TO CYBERCULTURE PDF
From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Available at In the early s, . From Counterculture to Cyberculture has ratings and 44 reviews. Warwick said: This is a sad story in many ways: I wonder if the author realises quite. Journal of e-Media Studies Volume I, Issue 1, Spring Dartmouth College Fred Turner, From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth.
|Published (Last):||1 June 2005|
|PDF File Size:||1.75 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.67 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Turner provides a convincing narrative for some of the strangest transformations in modern American culture: But by the s—and the dawn of the Internet—computers started to represent a very different kind of world: That said, you should have a strong interest in either the counterculture movement of the sixties or the development of nineties cyberculture especially the Well and Wired magazine if too plan on picking up this book.
Events in History and Philosophy of Science. You may purchase this title at these fine bookstores. Between andvia such familiar venues as the National Book Award—winning Whole Earth Catalogthe computer conferencing system known as WELL, and, ultimately, the launch of the wildly successful Wired magazine, Brand and his colleagues brokered a long-running collaboration between San Francisco flower power and the emerging technological hub of Silicon Valley.
From Counterculture to Cyberculture
Does Science Need a Global Language? Fred Cybetculture here traces the previously untold story of a highly influential group of San Francisco Bay—area entrepreneurs: A Little to academically dry for my tastes, but an interesting book nonetheless. From Counterculture to Cyberculture is the first book to explore this extraordinary and ironic transformation. He also has no patience for the modern fad cyberculure history of science for describing the ways in which science is “socially constructed” – this is a cultural, not epistemic reading of the course of science and technology.
Giles Slade Los Angeles Times.
Contained some great anecdotes but overall was very repetitive. An excellent academic book. A well-researched profile of Stewart Brand and his cohort, illustrating not only the nuances of the historical cyberrculture between communalist strains of the 60s counterculture and internet optimism post-cyberdelia in a more careful and accurate way than What the Dormouse Said but the incredible power of Brand’s own reputation-building and power-building techniques which have been more recently replicated by Tim Cointerculture.
Instead, this garbage kills any interest I’ve ever had in the subject and I’m almost embarrassed now to have been on such a cool and influential BBS as The WELL after Turner has turned his destructive powers of total boredom on it.
I even thought that the breakpoint that let corporations take over the Internet countrculture right before the first Internet bubble burst, back when I worked in “new media” after I graduate college in ’97, ‘ If you can stomach dryly-academic books with no stylistic flair, this is a good one.
From Counterculture to Cyberculture
It’s one of those books that really helps clarify where we are and how we got here. Shedding new light on how our networked culture came to be, this fascinating book reminds us that the distance between the Grateful Dead and Google, between Ken Kesey and the computer itself, is not as great as we might think. In the early s, computers haunted the American popular imagination.
Digital utopianism continues to morph with the rise cyberculturee th As a life-long student of communication, I somehow missed this one by Fred Turner at Stanford.
It answered many personal questions I had. Unlike many other histories that focus on the technical innovators. It connects us with how the internet, although originally designed as a tool for the military to respond to a nuclear attack, it was interpreted by the counter culture movement as a potential tool to unite society.
Thanks to their vision, counterculturalists and technologists alike joined together to reimagine computers as tools for personal liberation, the building of virtual and decidedly alternative communities, and the exploration of bold new social frontiers. The free Internet still exists, but in a lot of ways it lives off to the side of the Internet at large, like a dirty, cluttered garage attached to the much nicer house that naked commercialism built.
This chronicle of how a great countercultural icon like Stewart Brand could morph into the father of digital utopianism, following in the footsteps of Marshall McLuhan is a fascinating trip down memory lane for me.
I’m not going to lie; I was swept along with Wired’s mid-’90s neon cyberspace revolution hype, without realizing it was always a future run by corporations. Did perso An excellent study of the history and relationship between the counter-culture of the 60s and 70s and the emergence of personal computing and the Internet.
Mar 03, Shy Frkm rated it it was ok.
As a result, I stopped reading about half way through. Made me reconsider a lot of ideas I now realize I had uncritically swa A well-researched profile of Stewart Brand and his cohort, illustrating not only the nuances of the historical connection between communalist strains of the 60s counterculture and internet optimism post-cyberdelia in a more careful and accurate way than What the Dormouse Said cyberxulture the incredible power of Brand’s own reputation-building and cyebrculture techniques which have been more recently replicated by Tim O’Reilley.
A skillful recounting of xounterculture of the most important philosophical and personal history of the Internet. No doubt, these leaders had and continue to have operative roles in shaping the discourse and the networks they built up, but as a structuring and narrative lens, it now feels incomplete or lopsided to focus primarily on the many published manifestoes of those voices.
While not going so far as to completely answer cunterculture questions, Turner provides a detailed and unbiased cultural history that informs further research into these questions. Jul 29, Sebastian rated it really liked it. If you like books and love to build cool products, we may be looking for you. Giving up with this for the moment. I initially picked this book since it discusses many events that were part of my life as well — from the Summer of Love in SF to working for the government on classified computer projects.
Alas, this counyerculture world was not to be.
Jan 11, Bastian Greshake Tzovaras rated it really liked it. This makes the case easy to follow, but puts a lot of the credit on key leader figures instead of the communities that are built around them. To ask other readers questions about From Counterculture to Cybercultureplease sign up. Writing is just realllly dry. Made me reconsider a lot of ideas I now realize I had uncritically swallowed from Wired.
Ideals have fallen by the wayside in favor of commercial interests, and the democratic, everyone-has-his-own-soapbox Internet envisioned by the digital elites has instead given way to walled gardens and tightly controlled platforms.
University of Chicago Press: A bit dull, but well worth reading. The reality has been quite different. This is a book that belongs in both graduate and undergraduate classrooms, not just for its scholarly message but for the deep chill it leaves behind.
These intrinsic contradictions should get us to appreciate and be ready to accept that the world is always more complicated than our ideas make of it. Feb 26, Sara Watson rated it really liked it. A well-woven history of the ’60s counterculture, as personified in Stewart Brand, and its evolution countercultude the cyberculture that came to prominence in the s with the Internet boom and, in some small part, informs the digital culture of today.
Nov 20, h.